Reduce cost of Web Browsing

[brandon.roeder]

I go away from this forum. The last 4 messages where to bother me. No solution anywhere. My pocket only lets me spend 35 MB and I try to get around with this.

That is why I post this doubt. If I had an unlimited plan, I would not have posted it.

In conclusion: No one knows about Moto Q 9h browsers. Good bye

wow..umm

No comment

[ninjaap]

I go away from this forum. The last 4 messages where to bother me. No solution anywhere. My pocket only lets me spend 35 MB and I try to get around with this.

That is why I post this doubt. If I had an unlimited plan, I would not have posted it.

In conclusion: No one knows about Moto Q 9h browsers. Good bye

Dude, you're not listening. It's the web pages, not the browsers you should be worried about. You have been given a few good advices, but you refuse to accept them.

[sherri]

Op has left the building!

[I8qbert]

just like wammbo he is lurking so we are venting ;)
sent from Q

[fr4nk1yn]

But I did answer your question.
The rest was just to show that what your looking to do isn't very logical.
That 35mb is probably for mms.
There's no way they'd give you that expecting into browse.
I go to a site that would use that in 6 page loads.

Opera Mini is the best bet

[lhbalesjr]

The OP could test this on his or her own, but clearing the cache and loading the same page in both PIE and Opera. Between these two tests he could go to settings - Packet data and see how much each browser required for that same site.

I know that not everyone likes it, but I never use anything but Opera Mini 4.1 (To be specific, Opera Mini hifi lemontopic us v. 4.1.11355,20080522) Opera Mini only takes about 3 seconds to start up and web pages seem to load much faster than on any other browser I have tried.